|
IFC gets Walloped in Jury Trial |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Monday, 26 June 2006 |
|
With
Cook County Superior Court Justice Matthew F. Kennelly
presiding, and in what may be the first IFC Credit
Corporation-NorVergence lease jury trial, a precedent
may be set in a win by Gregory Adamski, Managing Partner
and Samantha R. Engel, Attorney, Adamski & Conti,
Chicago, Illinois. The jury heard the case for four
days and took only 2 1/2 hours (over the lunch hour)
to agree with the presentation that United Business
& Industrial Federal Credit Union was "induced
by fraud to sign the 5 NorVergence contracts without
knowledge of, or reasonable opportunity to learn of,
the character or essential terms of the contracts."
The legal term for this defense is called "fraud in
the factum" or "essential fraud."
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 August 2008 )
|
|
Read more... [IFC gets Walloped in Jury Trial]
|
|
|
FTC Settles Court Case Against NorVergence Principals |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Monday, 26 June 2006 |
|
Thomas
and Peter Salzano Prohibited from Making Future
Misrepresentations
Reaching
an important milestone in the NorVergence telecommunications
fraud case, the Federal Trade Commission today announced
it has settled charges against the company’s
founders and principals, Thomas N. Salzano and Peter
J. Salzano. Under separate settlements, the final
court orders will bar the Salzanos from engaging
in all fraudulent and deceptive conduct alleged
in the complaint, require them to make specific
disclosures when pitching products in the future,
and subject them each to $50 million monetary judgments,
which are mostly suspended.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 August 2008 )
|
|
Read more... [FTC Settles Court Case Against NorVergence Principals]
|
|
|
Texas Judge calls IFC leases 'Unconscionable' |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Friday, 09 June 2006 |
|
In
a 10 page document, Judge Montgomery of Dallas County,
Texas detailed a web of fraud and deceit on the
part of IFC Leasing for the now infamous lease agreements
between thousands of telecom subscribers and Norvergence.
In
the 'Findings of fact and Conclusions of Law' document
(see
it here) the findings are clear; Norvergence
was deliberately perpetrating fraud customers, and
IFC knew about it. IFC even went so far as to stop
buying leases from Norvergence, because of the high
rate of defaults and customer complaints. But the
lease deals continued, however, after Norvergence
re-worded the contract with IFC so they would have
less liability in the case of default.
By
April of 2004, it states, IFC knew Norvergence was
making promises of savings to their customers, with
no intentions of fulfilling them. Representatives
of IFC were reading confirmations to new customers,
promising them the 'Norvergence Savings' with full
knowledge that this savings would not be provided.
It
is a breath of fresh air to read a factual document
that shows logically and with no 'spin' what was
really going on behind the scenes. No longer a theory,
now the proof exists. The leasing companies (or
at least IFC) had full knowledge what was going
on, but only focused on the almighty dollar. Deny
it if you wish guys, but at least try to learn from
your mistakes.
Charles
Triglianos. Jr.
Editor and Chief,
Fight the Scam
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 August 2008 )
|
|
|
Texas Judge Rules against IFC Credit IFC to sue Leasing News for “Slander” |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 19 April 2006 |
|
In
the Specialty Optical dba SOS trial before the Honorable
Sally L. Montgomery, Dallas, Texas, IFC Credit Corporation
Officer John Estok, CLP, divulged that his company
has a $100 million asset portfolio with over $14
million in “up to 800” NorVergence leases
with 550 in question: “…for the last
18 months, every month out the door is $300,000
in payments to the banks, and every month in the
door is $100,000 or so of cash from settlements
and customers who are still making their payments.
“
The
funds are borrowed, allegedly $9 million from a
line of credit at PFF Bank (confirmed by the bank
officer to Leasing News), $3 million from two investment
groups (from three reliable sources), and $1 million
in other bank lines (from court testimony.)
In
this specific law suit, the “Equipment Rental
Agreement” is for 60 months at $543.67 or
$32,620.20. After testimony, it is learned that
IFC paid NorVergence $11,743 for a $28,000 original
invoice figure that yielded lease payments of $32,620.20.
The original lease factor was .0194, but in “reality”
was .0463 on a sixty month term.
This
is the first time Estok admits to the holdbacks,
which he guesses are over $2 million. The opposing
counsel questions whether perjury is involved.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 21 August 2008 )
|
|
Read more... [Texas Judge Rules against IFC Credit IFC to sue Leasing News for “Slander”]
|
|
|
Judge Certifies Consumers |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 14 September 2005 |
|
In the
New Jersey Superior Court, Monmouth County, in Exquisite Caterers
et al. v. Popular Leasing et al., Docket No.: MON –
L- 3686-04, the Honorable Robert A. Coogan, J.S.C. certified
a New Jersey statewide class of consumers who signed contracts
with Norvergence, Inc. for telecommunications equipment. Norvergence
filed for bankruptcy in July of 2004 in a federal court in
Newark, New Jersey. The defendants in the class action are
leasing companies that are seeking to enforce Norvergence
contracts assigned to them by Norvergence. There were approximately
11,000 former Norvergence customers nationwide and roughly
1450 of them were in New Jersey.
|
|
Read more... [Judge Certifies Consumers]
|
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Thursday, 08 September 2005 |
|
On September
14th at 8:30am, the Motion for Class Certification will be
heard once again at the Monmouth County Courthouse in New
Jersey and we must have a large showing at the courthouse!
This is
an extremely important hearing; you are urgently needed to
attend if you are in the area. This is your chance to represent
all 11,000 of us. Victims in the NJ, NY, CT and surrounding
areas, please attend. Our winning this fight not only depends
on our attorneys but also depends on your involvement and
support. Stand up for yourselves! Make your voice heard! Show
the leasing industry that united we are stronger. If all goes
well then a National Class may be in the picture!
|
|
Read more... [Get your day in court!]
|
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Wednesday, 07 September 2005 |
I talked
to our attorney's in PA today and they said that "now"
is the time to hire TX counsel. Once the judge rules that
CCL can refile against us using PECC, they then have to re-serve
us and before that happens, we need to have our suits ready
in TX. If we don't, then we have to use the Attorney's in
PA to answer the suit again. It makes much more sense to use
TX lawyers and TX laws, and make them come to TX to fight
us. Spread the word!
Nancy Tomerlin
Office Manager
DigitCom, Inc.
1145 W. Main St.
Arlington, TX 76013
817-261-3600office
817-261-3603fax
888-248-6228toll free
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
|